Mobile optimized shopping comparison

ABSTRACT

A system comprising a computer-readable storage medium storing at least one program and a computer-implemented method for generating a navigable user interface for a mobile shopping comparison application. In some embodiments, the method may include determining that a query request has indications of item specific attributes for comparison, identifying the most relevant item attributes corresponding to the item specific comparison, and presenting the attributes in conjunction with their corresponding items in a navigable user interface.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This application relates to data processing. In particular, example embodiments may relate to systems and methods for comparing item attributes in an online marketplace.

BACKGROUND

Typically, when comparing multiple articles of merchandise, there is a tradeoff between features and price. Therefore, it is often necessary for a user to compare a variety of item attributes before deciding on the item they wish to purchase. Users may wish to compare a variety of different item attributes based on the type of item for which they are searching. Current technology has allowed users to search for and purchase items in an online marketplace via a mobile device. It is often difficult to compare multiple results on a mobile device due to screen size and resolution without going back and forth from an item summary to full item details. Further, users may not always be aware of the most important item attributes to compare between certain types of items. As a result, a user may not make a fully informed decision, or may simply choose to avoid comparing items on their mobile device.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various ones of the appended drawings merely illustrate example embodiments of the present disclosure and cannot be considered as limiting its scope.

FIG. 1 is a network diagram depicting a network system having a client-server architecture configured for exchanging data over a network, according to an example embodiment.

FIG. 2 is an interaction diagram depicting example exchanges between a client device, an application server, and a third party server, consistent with some embodiments.

FIG. 3a is an interface diagram depicting an example query request, consistent with some embodiment.

FIG. 3b is an interface diagram depicting further exchanges of the example query request, consistent with some embodiments.

FIG. 3c is an interface diagram depicting even further exchanges of the example query request, consistent with some embodiments.

FIG. 3d is an interface diagram depicting even further exchanges of the example query request, consistent with some embodiments.

FIG. 3e is an interface diagram depicting even further exchanges of the example query request, consistent with some embodiments.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an example embodiment of multiple modules forming a mobile optimized comparison application, which is provided as part of the network system of FIG. 1.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an example method of comparing and presenting item attributes, consistent with some embodiments.

FIG. 6 is a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the example form of a computer system within which a set of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein may be executed.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to specific example embodiments for carrying out the inventive subject matter. Examples of these specific embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It will be understood that they are not intended to limit the scope of the claims to the described embodiments. On the contrary, they are intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the scope of the disclosure. In the following description, specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the subject matter. Embodiments may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In accordance with the present disclosure, components, process steps, and data structures may be implemented using various types of operating systems, programming languages, computing platforms, computer programs, and/or general purpose machines.

Aspects of the present disclosure describe systems and methods for improvements to online shopping comparisons on client devices. An online shopping comparison may be established between a client device and an application server of a content publisher and may include the presentation of content on the client device. For example, an online shopping comparison may include searching, viewing, and comparing multiple items before purchasing the items offered for sale in an online marketplace. As used herein, a “user” or an “entity” may be a person (e.g., a human), a business (e.g., a company), an organization, a group of people, a persona (e.g., a fictitious character), a bot, or any combination thereof.

The method may further include generating and causing the presentation of an interface that includes a visual representation of the item attribute comparison. These interfaces may allow a user to navigate through a number of item attributes associated with a number of items. In this manner, a user may be able to quickly and easily compare relevant attributes between a number of items on their mobile device, without the need to move back and forth between multiple item summaries and item details. Additionally, a user may avoid repeating operations that the user typically performs multiple times when comparing item attributes.

Aspects of the present disclosure may also include systems and methods for grouping the visual representations of the items and item attribute comparisons. Further aspects of these embodiments of the present disclosure may include automatically generating a list of the most relevant item attributes to compare, as well as a list of item suggestions based on historical data associated with a particular query.

FIG. 1 is a network diagram depicting a network system 100, according to one embodiment, having a client-server architecture configured for exchanging data over a network 102. While the network system 100 is depicted as having a client-server architecture, the present inventive subject matter is, of course, not limited to such an architecture, and could equally well find application in an event-driven, distributed, or peer-to-peer architecture system, for example. Further, to avoid obscuring the inventive subject matter with unnecessary detail, various functional components that are not germane to conveying an understanding of the inventive subject matter have been omitted from FIG. 1. Moreover, it shall be appreciated that although the various functional components of the network system 100 are discussed in the singular sense, multiple instances of any one of the various functional components may be employed.

The network system 100 may include a network-based content publisher 104 in communication with a client device 106 and a third party server 108. In some example embodiments, the network-based content publisher 104 may be a network-based marketplace (e.g., eBay.com). The network-based content publisher 104 may communicate and exchange data within the network system 100 that may pertain to various functions and aspects associated with the network system 100 and its users. The network-based content publisher 104 may provide server-side functionality, via a network 102 (e.g., the Internet), to network devices such as the client device 106.

The client device 106 may be operated by users who use the network system 100 to exchange data over the network 102. These data exchanges may include transmitting, receiving (communicating), and processing data to, from, and regarding content and users of the network system 100. The data may include, but are not limited to, images; video or audio content; user preferences; product and service feedback, advice, and reviews; product, service, manufacturer, and vendor recommendations and identifiers; product and service listings associated with buyers and sellers; product and service advertisements; auction bids; transaction data; user profile data; and social data, among other things.

The client device 106 may interface with the network-based content publisher 104 via a connection with the network 102. Depending on the form of the client device 106, any of a variety of types of connections and networks 102 may be used. For example, the connection may be Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) connection, a Global System for Mobile communications (GSM) connection, or another type of cellular connection. Such a connection may implement any of a variety of types of data transfer technology, such as Single Carrier Radio Transmission Technology (1×RTT), Evolution-Data Optimized (EVDO) technology, General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) technology, Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE) technology, or other data transfer technology (e.g., fourth generation wireless, 4G networks). When such technology is employed, the network 102 may include a cellular network that has a plurality of cell sites of overlapping geographic coverage, interconnected by cellular telephone exchanges. These cellular telephone exchanges may be coupled to a network backbone (e.g., the public switched telephone network (PSTN), a packet-switched data network, or other types of networks).

In another example, the connection to the network 102 may be a Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi, IEEE 602.11x type) connection, a Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) connection, or another type of wireless data connection. In such an embodiment, the network 102 may include one or more wireless access points coupled to a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), the Internet, or another packet-switched data network. In yet another example, the connection to the network 102 may be a wired connection (e.g., an Ethernet link), and the network 102 may be a LAN, a WAN, the Internet, or another packet-switched data network. Accordingly, a variety of different configurations are expressly contemplated.

In various embodiments, the data exchanged within the network system 100 may be dependent upon user-selected functions available through one or more client or user interfaces (UIs). The UIs may be associated with a client device, such as the client device 106 executing a web client 110 (e.g., an Internet browser), which may be in communication with the network-based content publisher 104. The UIs may also be associated with one or more applications 112 executing on the client device 106, such as a mobile application designed for interacting with the network-based content publisher 104 or with a social network platform hosted by the third party server 108.

Turning specifically to the network-based content publisher 104, an Application Program Interface (API) server 114 and a web server 116 are coupled to, and provide programmatic and web interfaces respectively to, an application server 118. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the application server 118 may be coupled via the API server 114 and the web server 116 to the network 102, for example, via wired or wireless interfaces. The application server 118 is, in turn, shown to be coupled to a database server 120 that facilitates access to a database 122. In some examples, the application server 118 can access the database 122 directly without the need for the database server 120. The database 122 may include multiple databases that may be internal or external to the network-based content publisher 104.

The application server 118 may, for example, host one or more applications, which may provide a number of content publishing and viewing functions and services to users who access the network-based content publisher 104. For example, the network-based content publisher 104 may host a marketplace application that provides a number of marketplace functions and services to users, such as publishing, listing, and price-setting mechanisms whereby a seller may list (or publish information concerning) goods or services (also collectively referred to as “products”) for sale, a buyer can express interest in or indicate a desire to purchase such goods or services, and a price can be set for a transaction pertaining to the goods or services.

As illustrated in FIG. 1, the application server 118 hosts a mobile shopping comparison application 124 that provides message generation and publishing services to users of the network-based content publisher 104. For example, the mobile shopping comparison application 124 may receive requests from a user to share a product listing with one or more other users, and in turn, the mobile shopping comparison application 124 may generate and facilitate the publishing of a message to share the product listing. The mobile shopping comparison application 124 may cause the messages to be “published” in the sense that they are communicated, albeit through a variety of means, to other users or entities.

The messages generated and published by the mobile shopping comparison application 124 may also include a reference to content (e.g., a link). As used herein, the terms “content” or “content item” refer to electronic data that is consumed by viewers (e.g., users) on displays, client devices, or page/display-based media (e.g., World-Wide Web (WWW) media embodied in browsers and accessible over the Internet). As such, the terms “content” and “content item” may refer to data associated with readable text, data associated with images, data associate with graphics or video, programmatic content, scripts, or data corresponding to various combinations of these.

Consistent with some embodiments, users may utilize the mobile shopping comparison application 124 to generate messages that are separate from and independent of any existing content. For example, users may utilize the mobile shopping comparison application 124 to automatically generate a status update. Further, while the mobile shopping comparison application 124 is shown in FIG. 1 to form part of the network-based content publisher 104, it will be appreciated that, in alternative embodiments, the mobile shopping comparison application 124 may form part of a service that is separate and distinct from the network-based content publisher 104.

The database 122 may comprise a number of repositories used to store data pertaining to various functions and aspects associated with the network system 100 and its users. For example, the database 122 may include a repository to store and maintain user profiles for users of the network-based content publisher 104. Each user profile may comprise user profile data that describes aspects of a particular user. The user profile data may, for example, include demographic data, user preferences, social data, and financial information. The demographic data may, for example, include information describing one or more characteristics of a user such as gender, age, location information (e.g., hometown or current location), employment history, education history, contact information, familial relations, or user interests. The financial information may, for example, include private financial information of the user such as account number, credential, password, device identifier, user name, phone number, credit card information, bank information, transaction history, or other financial information which may be used to facilitate online transactions by the user.

The database 122 may also include a repository to store a record of user activity data. Accordingly, the network-based content publisher 104 may monitor, track, and record the activities of users utilizing one or more devices (e.g., the client device 106) to interact with the various components of the network system 100. Each user session may be maintained in a repository stored in the database 122. Accordingly, the user activity data may include past keyword searches that users have performed, web pages viewed by each user, products added to a user wish list or watch list, products added to an electronic shopping cart, and products that the users own. Consistent with some embodiments, the repository used to store records of user activity may be linked to the repository used to store user profile data so as to maintain an association of a user profile with the activities that the corresponding user has performed.

In instances in which the network-based content publisher 104 is a network-based marketplace, the database 122 may include a repository to store product information. Such product information may, for example, include a product identifier (e.g., a title or a model number), a price, a make, a manufacturer, a model, a brand name, a textual description, a size, a style, product dimensions, compatibility information, or any other information that may be used to describe a product. In these instances, the database 122 may also include a repository to store a transaction history of users of the network-based content publisher 104 that includes information related to transactions for products that may be offered for sale by merchants who utilize marketplace services provided by the network-based content publisher 104. The transaction history information may, for example, include a description of a product offered for sale, sold, or purchased by users, an identifier of the product, a category to which the product belongs, a purchase price, a purchase date, a purchased quantity, a number of bids for the product, or various combinations thereof.

FIG. 1 also illustrates a third party application 126 executing on the third party server 108 that may offer information or services to the application server 118 or to users of the client device 106. The third party application 126 may have programmatic access to the network-based content publisher 104 via a programmatic interface provided by the API server 114. The third party application 126 may be associated with any organization that may conduct transactions with or provide services to the application server 118 or to users of the client device 106. For example, the third party application 126 may be associated with a network based social network platform (e.g., Facebook®, Twitter®, Google+®, Pinterest®), LinkedIn®, or the like) that may provide a platform for members to build and maintain social networks and relations among members.

FIG. 2 is an interaction diagram depicting example exchanges between a client device, an application server, and a third party server, consistent with some embodiments. In particular, FIG. 2 depicts example exchanges between the client device 106, the mobile shopping comparison application 124, and the third party server 108, which, in this example embodiment, corresponds to an online marketplace (e.g., ebay.com). As shown, at operation 202, the client device 106 (the user of which is referred to as the “requesting user” or “requestor”) transmits a query request for an item using a mobile device, which in this example is to generate a list of relevant items in an online marketplace.

At operation 204, the mobile shopping comparison application 124 accesses the third party server 108 (e.g., an online store or marketplace) and at operation 206 retrieves relevant search results to the query request. The relevance of the results may be based on query-dependent or query-independent criteria. For example, query-dependent criteria generally identifies the degree to which a document or item is semantically related to the content of the query itself, while query-independent criteria seek to measure the relevance of a particular document or item based on intrinsic properties of the document or item itself. These properties may include information pertaining to other users who may be similar or related to a querying user, who may have searched for and selected a particular item, as well as information corresponding to the querying user themselves. In some embodiments, the search results may include one or more items found in an online marketplace, wherein each item may have associated with it: an item summary, an item description, one or more images, relevant item attributes, transaction information, and user activity data.

At operation 208, in response to receiving the results of the query request, a determination is made if the query request results have indications of item specific attributes for comparison, because a user may wish to compare specific item attributes corresponding to different items prior to making a decision on an item for purchase. For example, a user searching for a personal computer to purchase, may wish to compare item attributes associated specifically with televisions, such as operating system, quantity of RAM, the type of processor, etc., while a user searching for a television to purchase may choose to compare an entirely different set of item attributes associated specifically with televisions, such as size, definition, color or black and white, and so on. In some embodiments this may occur at the client device 106, the application server 118, or at the third party server 108.

In some embodiments, the determination that the results of the query request have indications of item specific attributes for comparison may be achieved by recognizing that the item attributes corresponding with the results of the query request have a high degree of correlation. In some embodiments, the item attribute comparison module 404 may be configured to compare the item attributes corresponding to the results of the query request, and determine that the items have item attributes for comparison when a majority of the results share one or more item attributes in common. In other embodiments, the item attribute comparison module 404 may determine that the items have item attributes for comparison when the item attributes of the search results are specific to a particular category of item. For example, if the results of a query request comprised one or more flat-screen TVs, with each listing including size in inches, brand, and screen resolution, a determination could be made that the query request results share item attributes with a high degree of correlation.

In further embodiments, the determination that the query request has indications of item specific comparison may be achieved by recognizing that the user is toggling between two or more item descriptions, or viewing multiple listings for similar products at once. In even further example embodiments, the determination that the query request has indications of item specific comparison may be based on a category that the user is searching, wherein the category is one that typically has item specific comparison criteria. In these embodiments item attribute comparison module 404 may be configured to determine that a particular category of item will always have item specific attributes for comparison. For example, the item attribute comparison module 404 may be configured to automatically determine that all query requests related to televisions will have certain item specific attributes for comparison, such as size, resolution, brand, etc.

Once a determination has been made that the query results contain indications of item specific criteria, at operation 210, the mobile shopping comparison application 124 may query the third party server 108 to access the most relevant item attributes to provide to the user for the purposes of comparison. The item attribute identification module 406 may be configured to determine which of the item specific attributes are most relevant for comparison. The particular item attributes selected by the item attribute identification module 406 may be based on the category which the items within the query results are from, which item attributes are most often compared by users, item attributes which the user most often compares, which item attributes appear most frequently in the corresponding search results, as well as which item attributes have the highest conversion rates. In some embodiments the user may select specific item attributes which they wish to compare through a user interface. For example, the user may manually select a specific set of item attributes corresponding to a particular category of items, which the item attribute identification module 406 may then use in determining which item attributes are most relevant.

At operation 212, upon receiving a request for the most relevant item attributes, the third party server 108 may provide the application server 118 with a list of relevant attributes. This may be based on conversion rate optimization, wherein the item attributes with the highest conversion rate are presented to the user. Conversion rate optimization is the method of creating an experience for a website or landing page with the goal of increasing the percentage of visitors that may convert into customers. In this context, a conversion rate is defined as the percentage of visitors who complete a goal, set by the site owner. Here, the goal may be to purchase a particular item. In some embodiments, the presentation module 410 may be configured to only present the specific item attributes selected by the item attribute identification module 406, while in other embodiments the presentation module 410 may present the item attributes selected by item attribute identification module 406, in conjunction with a list of standard item attributes which may apply broadly to all items posted within an online marketplace, such as price, item location, and information corresponding to the seller. In other embodiments, the user may be able to select specifically how many item attributes are to be displayed for comparison by the presentation module 410, through an interactive user interface.

At operation 214, the item attribute identification module 406 may prompt the user to identify specific item attributes for comparison between items. The user may then select, via a user interface, one or more additional item attributes which correspond to a particular item to compare. In some embodiments, the user may be presented with a list of item attributes corresponding to items which, at operation 216, the user may then provide the item attribute identification module 406 with additional item attributes.

Once a list of item attributes has been created, the presentation module 406 may generate UI elements representing the results of the query request and the item attributes for comparison, as in operation 218. The UI element representing the results of the query request may contain information such as a product title, one or more images of the item, and an item description. In some embodiments, a user may be able to select from one or more items to view in the display by selecting items from a list of results. In further embodiments, a user may navigate the search results through a recognized gesture performed on a client device. The recognized gesture may be pressing a button or a swiping motion on a touch enabled device. In even further example embodiments, the most popular or highest rated item may be automatically displayed to the user as a default.

In some embodiments, the UI representing the item attributes may be a static item attributes panel that changes values while fixing the attribute titles as a user scrolls through the list of results. The item attributes that are displayed may be manually selected by the user themselves, or in other embodiments, may be determined by selecting the item attributes with the highest degree of correlation, or with the highest conversion rate. In further embodiments, the item attributes displayed may be based upon the category in which the queried items are categorized.

FIG. 3a is an interface diagram depicting a query request interface 301 displaying visual representations of various states of the US, consistent with some embodiments. In particular, this query request interface 301 includes elements 302 and 304, which are visual representations of a search query and an alphanumeric keyboard, respectively. As shown, a user may enter a desired search query 302 through use of the keyboard 304. In further embodiments, the search query may be entered by means of voice recognition.

The query request interface 301 may further include a tab 303, which may be used to hide or expand aspects of the query request interface. In some embodiments, a user may hide the keyboard 304 via a recognized gesture on a touch enabled device.

FIG. 3b is an interface diagram depicting a search query 302, as in FIG. 3a , and its corresponding search results 310. The search results 310 may be based on query-dependent or query-independent criteria. In some embodiments, a user may be able to sort the results based on item attributes such as price, size, brand, color, item location, and other attributes associated with the items.

FIG. 3c is an interface diagram depicting a first UI element 320 configured to present an item 321 selected from one or more of the search results 310 from FIG. 3b , in conjunction with a second UI element 322, configured to present one or more item attributes corresponding to the selected item 321. The tab 303 may be used to hide or expand the sizes of the first and second UI elements 320 and 322, based on a corresponding recognized gesture on a touch enabled device. In some embodiments, a user may be able to prioritize or sort the item attributes displayed in the second UI based on their own preference. The second UI element 322 may further include a user selectable option 324 to add additional item attributes for comparison. In further embodiments, a user may set a desired range or specify aspects of the item attributes which they may be particularly interested in finding through selection of a pre-defined button or icon. For example, a user may primarily be interested in viewing blue helmets within a price range of $30 and $40. By selecting a specified price range and adding desired details to the item attribute, the second UI element 322 may indicate to the user a level of compliance of an item to their specified criteria. In some embodiments this may be achieved by highlighting each item attribute in a corresponding color or pattern which indicates a level of compliance, with specific colors or patterns assigned to varying levels of compliance. For example, a high level of compliance may be represented by highlighting an item attribute in green, while a low level of compliance may be represented by highlighting an item attribute in red.

In further embodiments, a visual indicator is also presented illustrating where a particular item attribute value is in comparison with the overall results. For example, in FIG. 3c this is illustrated by placing the corresponding item attribute value on a scale, wherein a position at the far left of the scale indicates that the corresponding value is among the lowest value of the overall results, whereas a position to the right side of the scale indicates a corresponding value among the higher values of the overall results. In FIG. 3c the corresponding price value is illustrated as being positioned toward the right side of the scale, indicating that the price value is among the more expensive values of the overall results, while the corresponding size value is positioned to the left side of the scale, indicating that the corresponding item is among the smallest of the overall results.

FIG. 3d is an interface diagram depicting a first UI element 320, in conjunction with a second UI element 322, where the second UI element 322 is configured to present one or more user selectable item attributes 330 corresponding to the selected item 321. In some embodiments, a user may manually add or remove item attributes to be displayed in the second UI element 322 by placing a check mark beside the relevant attribute, or through a similar means of indicating the selection of an item. In further example embodiments, a user may be given the option to select the “top,” or “most popular,” attributes associated with a particular category of items. The “top,” or “most popular,” may be selected based on the degree of correlation between the items listed in the results of a search query, or based on what other users historically considered when viewing a particular item. For example, the item attribute identification module 406 may be configured to compare all item attributes corresponding to a particular set of search results, and determine that the item attributes which appear most frequently in relation to the particular category of item are the “top” attributes. The item attribute identification module 406 may also identify the corresponding item attributes which are most frequently selected for comparison by users, when viewing a particular category of item.

As discussed above, a user may be able to set criteria or a desired range associated with each item attribute displayed in the second UI element 322. FIG. 3e is an interface diagram depicting a second UI element 322. In some embodiments, a user may select details or set limits associated with item attributes. Consistent with some embodiments, this may be accomplished by affixing a check mark beside specific details a user may desire, or alternatively by setting an acceptable range. For example, a user may select specific brands that they may prefer by placing a check mark beside a brand they may desire. In selecting details or limits for each item attribute, in some embodiments, the user may be enabled to sort the search query results by displaying items with the highest compliance to their selected details or limits in order of compliance.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating various functional modules of a mobile shopping comparison application 124, which is provided as part of the network system 100, consistent with some embodiments. The mobile shopping comparison application 124 is shown as including a communications module 400, an item attribute comparison module 404, an item attribute identification module 406, a UI module 408, and a presentation module 410, all configured to communicate with each other (e.g., via a bus, shared memory, a switch, or APIs). The various modules of the mobile shopping comparison application 124 may, furthermore, access the databases 122 via the database servers 120, and each of the various modules of the mobile shopping comparison application 124 may be in communication with one or more of the third party applications 126 (e.g., online marketplace). Further, while the modules of FIG. 4 are discussed in the singular sense, it will be appreciated that in other embodiments multiple modules may be employed.

The communication module 400 is responsible receiving query requests from a user, to retrieve items displayed within an online marketplace. The communication module 400 may also be configured to receive user inputs from the user, such as input by the user with a keyboard or touch enabled device, voice recognition, as well as data corresponding to a user's location.

The item attribute comparison module 404 is configured to determine that a query request has indications that the results of the request will have item specific attributes for comparison. For example the result of a user's query may comprise two or more similar items with varying values for corresponding item attributes. Such results may require a user to compare the corresponding item attributes in order to decide which item among the results they may wish to purchase. The item attribute comparison module 404 may be configured to determine that a query request has indications of item specific attributes for comparison when: a majority of the query results share one or more item attributes in common, the item attributes of the search results are generally considered to be exclusive to a particular category of item; the user toggles between two or more item descriptions, or views multiple listings for similar products in a single communication session.

In some embodiments, the item attribute comparison module 404 may determine that a query request has indications that the results have item specific attributes for comparison when a majority of the query results share one or more item attributes in common. For example, when a majority of the results of a query request all share one or more item attributes in common with one another, the item attribute comparison module 404 may make a determination that the resulting requests have indications of item specific attributes for comparison.

In some embodiments, the item attribute comparison module 404 may determine that a query request has indications that the results have item specific attributes for comparison when the items corresponding to the query results share item attributes which may generally be considered to be exclusive to a particular category of item. For example, the item attribute comparison module 404 may be configured such that it may recognize and correlate a particular set of item attributes to a particular category of items. In some embodiments this may be based on historical data associated with the online marketplace. In other embodiments it may be based on predetermined criteria set by the user or a user with administrative privileges.

In some embodiments, the item attribute comparison module 404 may determine that a query request has indications of item specific attributes for comparison when the user toggles between multiple items in the query results, which each share one or more item attributes in common. For example, a user may select and view multiple items for viewing out of the query results and in doing so, toggle between two or more items in the query results. Upon detecting that the user is toggling between two or more of the query results, the item attribute comparison module 404 may analyze the particular items which the user is viewing, and upon comparing the corresponding item attributes of those items, determine that the query request has indications of item specific attributes for comparison.

The item attribute identification module 406 is responsible for identifying the most relevant item attributes associated with the results of the query request. The item attribute identification module 406 may determine which item attributes to select for comparison by analyzing: the categorization of the items within the query results, and what the most often viewed attributes in that particular category are; the conversion rates associated with the item attributes; which item attributes have the highest correlation; and what the user's own preferences suggest based on the user's search or transaction history.

In some embodiments, the item attribute identification module 406 may analyze the corresponding category of the items which make up the search results, and select the item attributes which may be most commonly associated with the corresponding category.

In some embodiments, the item attribute identification module 406 may be configured to utilize conversion rate optimization. As discussed above, conversion rate optimization is the method of creating an experience for a website or landing page with the goal of increasing the percentage of visitors that may convert into customers. In this context, a conversion rate is defined as the percentage of visitors who complete a goal, set by the sit owner. Here, the goal may be to purchase a particular item. The item attribute identification module 406 may select the item attributes which have the highest conversion rate.

In some embodiments, the item attribute identification module 406 may select the item attributes with the highest degree of correlation between search results for comparison. For example, the item attribute comparison module 406 may analyze the results of a query request and make a determination that a majority of the search results share one or more specific item attributes in common. The most common item attributes may then be selected for comparison.

In some embodiments, the item attribute identification module 406 may select the specific item attributes for comparison by the user by selecting item attributes corresponding to the user's preferences, based on the user's search or transaction history. For example, the item attribute identification module 406 may access a user's transaction history and determine that a user generally selects items which have certain item attributes in common. In other embodiments, the user may manually set preferred item attributes for comparison through a user interface.

The particular item attributes selected by the item attribute identification module 406 may be based on the category which the items within the query results are from, which item attributes are most often compared by users, item attributes which the user most often compares, which item attributes appear most frequently in the corresponding search results, as well as which item attributes have the highest conversion rates.

The UI module 408 is responsible for generating a navigable UI that presents the results of the query request and the item attributes associated with the results of the query request. In some embodiments, there may be a first UI that presents the results of the query request, and a second UI that presents the item attributes associated with those results. In further embodiments, the first and second UI may be presented in conjunction with one another, such that as the user navigates through the query request results, only one item remains in focus in the first UI, while the item attributes in the second UI remain static with only the associated values changing, based on the correlating item being displayed in the first UI.

In other embodiments the UI may also include: a search field, where a user may enter a search query 302, as is shown in FIG. 3a ; a keyboard 304; as well as various item attributes 322, as seen in FIG. 3c , which the user may refine through user input. In further embodiments, the UI module 408 may also be configured to include an image of one or more items from the results of a search request, which a user may select through a recognized gesture, such as touching or swiping on a touch enabled device.

The presentation module 410 is responsible for presenting the corresponding item attributes selected by the item attribute identification module 406 to the UI module 408. In some embodiments, the presentation module 410 may be configured to accept user selected inputs and refinements, and to then retrieve additional item attributes and search results.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an example method 500 to present navigable comparison criteria associated with items from the results of a search query, consistent with some embodiments. The method 500 may be embodied in computer-readable instructions for execution by one or more processors such that the steps of the method 500 may be performed in part or in whole by the application server 118. In particular, the method 500 may be carried out by the functional components of the mobile shopping comparison application 124, and accordingly, the method 500 is described below by way of example with reference thereto. However it shall be appreciated that the method 500 may be deployed on various other hardware configurations and is not intended to be limited to the functional components of the mobile shopping comparison application 124.

At operation 505, the item attribute comparison module 404 may determine that a query request has indications of item specific comparison. The result of a user's query may comprise a list of two or more similar items, each with their own item attributes. In some instances, the item attribute comparison module 404 may recognize that the query request has indications of item specific comparison by determining that the item attributes corresponding with the results of the query request have a high degree of correlation. A high degree of correlation between item attributes may suggest that a user may want to compare the associated item attributes before making a decision. In further embodiments, the item attribute comparison module 404 may determine that a query request has indications of item specific comparison based on the specific category in which the item belongs or, alternatively, if the item attribute comparison module 404 detects that a user is alternating between multiple items to view.

At operation 515, in response to the item attribute comparison module 404 determining that the query request has indications of item specific comparison, the item attribute identification module 406 responds by identifying the most relevant item attributes. In some instances, the most relevant item attributes may be defined as those attributes that have the highest conversion rate, highest degree of correlation, or are manually selected by the user most often. In other embodiments, the item attribute identification module 406 may identify the item attributes most commonly associated with a particular query request based on historical data associated with the user, or with the items in the result of the query request.

At operation 520, the query request and the item attributes may be presented to the user by the presentation module 410 in a navigable UI generated by the UI module 408. In some embodiments, the navigable UI may be a conjunction of two independent USs.

FIG. 6 is a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the example form of a computer system 600 within which a set of instructions for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein may be executed. The computer system 600 may correspond to the client device 106, the third party server 108, the API server 114, the web server 116, or the application server 118, consistent with some embodiments. The computer system 600 may include instructions for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein. In alternative embodiments, the machine operates as a standalone device or may be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine may operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in server-client network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment. The machine may be a personal computer (PC), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, a smart phone (e.g., iPhone®), a tablet computer, a web appliance, a handheld computer, a desktop computer, a laptop or netbook, a set-top box (STB) such as those provided by cable or satellite content providers, a wearable computing device such as glasses or a wristwatch, a multimedia device embedded in an automobile, a Global Positioning System (GPS) device, a data enabled book reader, a video game system console, a network router, switch or bridge, or any machine capable of executing instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine. Further, while only a single machine is illustrated, the term “machine” shall also be taken to include any collection of machines that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein.

The example computer system 600 includes a processor 602 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), or both), a main memory 604, and a static memory 606, which communicate with each other via a bus 608. The computer system 600 may further include a video display 610 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 600 also includes one or more input/output (I/O) devices 612, a location component 614, a drive unit 616, a signal generation device 618 (e.g., a speaker), and a network interface device 620. The I/O devices 612 may, for example, include a keyboard, a mouse, a keypad, a multi-touch surface (e.g., a touchscreen or track pad), a microphone, a camera, and the like.

The location component 614 may be used for determining a location of the computer system 600. In some embodiments, the location component 614 may correspond to a GPS transceiver that may make use of the network interface device 620 to communicate GPS signals with a GPS satellite. The location component 614 may also be configured to determine a location of the computer system 600 by using an Internet Protocol (IP) address lookup or by triangulating a position based on nearby mobile communications towers. The location component 614 may be further configured to store a user-defined location in the main memory 604 or the static memory 606. In some embodiments, a mobile location enabled application may work in conjunction with the location component 614 and the network interface device 620 to transmit the location of the computer system 600 to an application server or third party server for the purpose of identifying the location of a user operating the computer system 600.

In some embodiments, the network interface device 620 may correspond to a transceiver and antenna. The transceiver may be configured to both transmit and receive cellular network signals, wireless data signals, or other types of signals via the antenna, depending on the nature of the computer system 600.

Machine-Readable Medium

The drive unit 616 includes a machine-readable medium 622 on which is stored one or more sets of data structures and instructions 624 (e.g., software) embodying or used by any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The instructions 624 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 604, the static memory 606, and/or the processor 602 during execution thereof by the computer system 600, with the main memory 604, the static memory 606, and the processor 602 also constituting machine-readable media.

Consistent with some embodiments, the instructions 624 may relate to the operations of an operating system (OS). Depending on the particular type of the computer system 600, the OS may, for example, be the iOS® operating system, the Android® operating system, a BlackBerry® operating system, the Microsoft® Windows® Phone operating system, Symbian® OS, or webOS®. Further, the instructions 624 may relate to operations performed by applications (commonly known as “apps”), consistent with some embodiments. One example of such an application is a mobile browser application that displays content, such as a web page or a UI using a browser.

While the machine-readable medium 622 is shown in an example embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” may include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more data structures or instructions 624. The term “machine-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any tangible medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying instructions (e.g., the instructions 624) for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present disclosure, or that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying data structures used by or associated with such instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, and optical and magnetic media. Specific examples of machine-readable media include non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices (e.g., erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM)) and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks, and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. Machine readable media excludes signals per se.

Transmission Medium

The instructions 624 may further be transmitted or received over a network 626 using a transmission medium. The instructions 624 may be transmitted using the network interface device 620 and any one of a number of well-known transfer protocols (e.g., HTTP). Examples of communication networks include a LAN, a WAN, the Internet, mobile telephone networks, POTS networks, and wireless data networks (e.g., WiFi and WiMax networks). The term “transmission medium” shall be taken to include any intangible medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying the instructions 624 for execution by the machine, and includes digital or analog communications signals or other intangible media to facilitate communication of such software.

Although the embodiments of the present inventive subject matter have been described with reference to specific example embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader scope of the inventive subject matter. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. The accompanying drawings that form a part hereof show by way of illustration, and not of limitation, specific embodiments in which the subject matter may be practiced. The embodiments illustrated are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the teachings disclosed herein. Other embodiments may be used and derived therefrom, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. This Detailed Description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of various embodiments is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full range of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.

Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein, individually and/or collectively, by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept if more than one is in fact disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be appreciated that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.

All publications, patents, and patent documents referred to in this document are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, as though individually incorporated by reference. In the event of inconsistent usages between this document and those documents so incorporated by reference, the usage in the incorporated references should be considered supplementary to that of this document; for irreconcilable inconsistencies, the usage in this document controls.

In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one, independent of any other instances or usages of“at least one” or “one or more.” In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, such that “A or B” includes “A but not B,” “B but not A,” and “A and B,” unless otherwise indicated. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended; that is, a system, device, article, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim are still deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” “third,” and so forth are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects. 

What is claimed:
 1. A method comprising: determining that a query request has indications of item specific attributes for comparison; identifying one or more item attributes corresponding to results of the query request, the item attributes having a label and a value; responsive to identifying that the query request has indications of item specific attributes for comparison; generating a first user interface element presenting the results of the query request, the first user interface element allowing a user to navigate through the results of the query request; and generating a second user interface element presenting the label and the value of the one or more item attributes corresponding to the results of the query request, the second user interface element allowing a user to navigate through the item attributes; presenting the first user interface element and the second user interface element to the user; wherein the label corresponding to the item attribute are presented in the second user interface element as static features; and the value of the corresponding label changes based on the item displayed in the first user interface element.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first user interface element and the second user interface element are presented in conjunction with one another, presenting the first user interface element and the second user interface element in a single display; and displaying a single item from the results, and the label and the value of the one or more item attributes corresponding to the single item from the results, at any given time.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the results of the query request displayed in the first user interface element are navigated by a recognized gesture on a touch enabled device; wherein the recognized gesture is a swiping motion.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first user interface element and the second user interface element are presented to the user responsive to determining that the query request has indications of item specific attributes for comparison within the results.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising a tab element which may be used to hide and expand aspects of the first user interface element and the second user interface element; wherein the user may interact with the tab element through a recognized gesture on a touch enabled device.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first user interface element may include a user input field to manually establish that the query request has indications of item specific comparison.
 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining that the query request has indications of item specific attributes for comparison when the item attributes corresponding with results of the query request have a high degree of correlation with one another.
 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining that the query request has indications of item specific attributes for comparison by recognizing that the user is toggling between two or more items.
 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising automatically determining that the query request has indications of item specific comparison by recognizing that the items in the results of the query request are in a category that typically has indications of item specific comparison.
 10. The second user interface of claim 1, further comprising a list the labels of item attributes; wherein the user may manually select the labels of the item attributes from the list to be presented in the second user interface.
 11. The second user interface of claim 1, further comprising user selectable limits and criteria corresponding with each of the value of the item attributes; wherein the user selectable limits and criteria may include a field to enter maximum and minimum values.
 12. The second user interface of claim 11, further comprising highlighting the label and the value of the one or more item attributes in a corresponding color or pattern indicating a level of compliance to the user selected limits and criteria; wherein the level of compliance may be represented by a distinct color and patterns.
 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more item attributes presented in the second user interface element are selected based on a user transaction history; wherein the user transaction history may include previous purchases and sales made by the user, and the one or more item attributes corresponding to items previously purchased and sold by the user are selected.
 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more item attributes presented in the second user interface element are selected based on a corresponding conversion rate; wherein the item attributes with a highest conversion rate among the item attributes corresponding to the results are selected.
 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more item attributes presented in the second user interface element are selected based on a category which the results of the query request are from; wherein the one or more item attributes correspond to the category.
 16. A system comprising: a processor of a machine; an item attribute comparison module to determine, using the processor of the machine, that a query request has indications of item specific comparison; an identification module to identify item attributes and corresponding label and value for the item attributes associated with results of the query request; a user interface module to generate a first user interface element presenting the results of the query request, the first user interface element allowing a user to navigate through the results of the query request; the user interface module to generate a second user interface element presenting the label and value of the one or more item attributes corresponding to the results of the query request, the second user interface element allowing a user to navigate through the label and value of the one or more item attributes; and a presentation module, to present the first user interface element and the second user interface element in conjunction with one another.
 17. The system of claim 15, wherein the presentation module presents the first user interface, and the second user interface in a single display; wherein the first user interface and the second user interface are positioned side by side or one on top of the other.
 18. The system of claim 15, wherein the user interface module generates an interface displaying user selectable limits and criteria corresponding with the value of the one or more item attributes; wherein the generated interface includes a field to enter maximum and minimum values for the value of the corresponding item attribute.
 19. The system of claim 17, wherein the user interface module highlights the presented item attributes in a corresponding color or pattern indicating a level of compliance to the user selectable limits and criteria; wherein the corresponding color or pattern indicating a level of compliance may be defined manually by the user; and wherein the corresponding color or pattern indicating a level of compliance may be defined by the user interface module.
 20. The system of claim 15, wherein the item attribute comparison module determines that the query request has indications of item specific comparison by recognizing that the items in the results of the query request are part of an item category that typically has indications of item specific comparison. 